http://ouleft.sp-mesolite.tilted.net/?p=1799 Changing Our Thinking, Changing Opinion, Changing the World Mon, 05 Dec 2022 21:47:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://ouleft.sp-mesolite.tilted.net/?p=1799#comment-5733 Charles Brown Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:07:15 +0000 http://ouleft.sp-mesolite.tilted.net/?p=1799#comment-5733 Note: Lenin gives us the concepts of "finance capital" and dominance of monopoly. Isn't it obvious that Lenin's notion of "finance capital" is truer now than when he wrote it ? Note: Lenin gives us the concepts of “finance capital” and dominance of monopoly. Isn’t it obvious that Lenin’s notion of “finance capital” is truer now than when he wrote it ?

]]> http://ouleft.sp-mesolite.tilted.net/?p=1799#comment-5732 Charles Brown Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:05:32 +0000 http://ouleft.sp-mesolite.tilted.net/?p=1799#comment-5732 Another set of theorists, global dialecticians,[4] responded to the new theorizing by reminding people that globalization was not new. In fact, they argued, globalization was a characteristic feature of capitalism as a mode of production. Marx, in The Communist Manifesto, recognized that capitalists sought markets, cheap labor and natural resources all across the globe. Having reminded readers of the historic nature of the globalization process, the global dialecticians suggested that particular features of contemporary history made the globalization process more likely; the United States as the last remaining superpower and the transformation of communications via the internet for example. For the dialecticians, the process of globalization was new and old at the same time. It had its roots in the rise of capitalism out of feudalism and it was transformed by economic, political, military, and technological changes that had occurred over the last fifty years.//////////// Exactly, and Lenin's _Imperialism_ defined a new stage of capitalist "globalization. Clearly, "globalization" is a continuation of the process defined by The Manifesto and _Imperialism_. Another set of theorists, global dialecticians,[4] responded to the new theorizing by reminding people that globalization was not new. In fact, they argued, globalization was a characteristic feature of capitalism as a mode of production. Marx, in The Communist Manifesto, recognized that capitalists sought markets, cheap labor and natural resources all across the globe. Having reminded readers of the historic nature of the globalization process, the global dialecticians suggested that particular features of contemporary history made the globalization process more likely; the United States as the last remaining superpower and the transformation of communications via the internet for example. For the dialecticians, the process of globalization was new and old at the same time. It had its roots in the rise of capitalism out of feudalism and it was transformed by economic, political, military, and technological changes that had occurred over the last fifty years.//////////// Exactly, and Lenin’s _Imperialism_ defined a new stage of capitalist “globalization. Clearly, “globalization” is a continuation of the process defined by The Manifesto and _Imperialism_.

]]>